Construct validity revisited

As written about earlier, Gipps and Murphy (1994) discuss validity and bias (or lack of it). They cite Cronbach and Messick’s notions of a unitary model of validity based on the construct. This construct validity is regarded, say Gipps and Murphy, as one of the three dimensions – the others being content and criterion. They argue that no content or criteria can ever be free from bias, and hence these are less dominant aspects when looking for validity.

On the other hand the Futurelab report I wrote about yesterday takes this overarching construct validity as being composed of four aspects.

  • content validity: are items fully representative of the topic being measured?
  • convergent validity: given the domain definition, are constructs which should be related to each other actually observed to be related to each other?
  • discriminant validity: given the domain definition, are constructs which should not be related to each other actually observed to be unrelated?
  • concurrent validity: does the test correlate highly with other tests which supposedly measure the same things?

(ibid, appendix A, page 24)

The definition in the report is that construct validity = the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. This is not at odds with Gipps and Murphy.

Advertisements

One Response to Construct validity revisited

  1. […] validity), Gronlund argues that validity is a unitary concept. This echoes Cronbach and Messick as discussed earlier. There is no validity without all of these facets I suppose would be one way of looking at […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: