http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/ Some thoughts about the notion of validity of assessment when applied to ICT in secondary schools Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:41:08 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-1080 Elliott (2008) Assessment 2.0 « ICT Assessment - valid, or what? Thu, 01 May 2008 18:51:21 +0000 http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-1080 [...] thoughts return though to the Macfarlane distinction between assessment of technology (eg the ICT curriculum) and assessment through technology (ie the [...] [...] thoughts return though to the Macfarlane distinction between assessment of technology (eg the ICT curriculum) and assessment through technology (ie the [...]

]]> http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-5 petebradshaw Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:43:09 +0000 http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-5 Yes I agree with this, Stevie. New knowledge is better than a gap... but maybe the bridge is new knowledge too... does it have to be 'to boldly go' or can it to 'to boldly make sense of'...? Yes I agree with this, Stevie. New knowledge is better than a gap… but maybe the bridge is new knowledge too… does it have to be ‘to boldly go’ or can it to ‘to boldly make sense of’…?

]]> http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-4 Stevie Vanhegan Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:14:52 +0000 http://petebradshaw.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/gap-in-knowledge-assessment-of-ict-v-assessment-with-ict/#comment-4 I wonder at the use of the term 'gap' Pete. I see the claim to new knowledge as building on the edge of existing knowledge - breaking into a new area - 'boldly go' - whereas 'gap' makes me think of bridging the gap between existing knowledges. Some parallels with induction and deduction possibly ... I wonder at the use of the term ‘gap’ Pete. I see the claim to new knowledge as building on the edge of existing knowledge – breaking into a new area – ‘boldly go’ – whereas ‘gap’ makes me think of bridging the gap between existing knowledges. Some parallels with induction and deduction possibly …

]]>